Wisconsin Vote Fraud goes unexplained in Day 12 of Wisconsin recount as Trump picks up votes and announced the winner.
Trump officially won Wisconsin by over 22,000 votes in Wisconsin but thanks to Jill Stein the state was recounted and the official recount now has Trump winning by even more votes after costing over $3.5 million dollars.
After day 7 of the recount the official updated recount results for Day 7 on Wisconsin Board of Elections update page showed Hillary Clinton losing 50,669 votes while Donald Trump lost 7,138 resulting in a net increase of 43,531 votes for Donald Trump.
Today the recount has is reported as completed on day 7 which finally included those missing votes including the absentee ballots for the county of Milwaukee where discovered vote fraud has gone unexplained.
The final net result showed Trump losing 661 votes and gaining 1535 votes for a net change of 874 additional votes.
Hillary Clinton lost 739 and gained 1,451 votes in the recount for a net change of 712 additional votes.
In posting the final results the Wisconsin Board of Elections did not explain the major discrepancies in the recount totals especially in Milwaukee Count where Hillary somehow managed to take in 8 out 9 absentee ballots despite only winning Milwaukee by a 2 to 1 margin on election day.
In the original vote, Hillary won Milwaukee ward 34 by a margin of 100 to 1 margin, originally counted as 795 votes for Hillary to 8 votes for Trump but after the recount the margin is now closer the Milwaukee average 2 to 1 win margin after a “discrepancy in the original results” resulted in the discovery of 246 additional votes for Trump.
Similarly Newburg in Ozaukee County ward originally showed Hillary winning by a statistically anomalous 8 to 1 margin but Trump has now won the county after the recount in which more originally uncounted Trump votes where found.
Milwaukee County is still a hotbed for statistical anomalies following the recount because precints right next to each other have huge discrepencies in win margins which and Hillary’s win margin in final recount absentee ballots sticks out like a sore thumb.
Despite only a 2 to 1 win margin county wide some Milwaukee wards have anomalous win margins for Hillary Clinton in the original vote count. As the the votes are recounted, some of these margins are coming more in line with the county average. Ward 34 only came inline after hundreds of missing Trump votes were found in the recount.
Excluding Milwaukee’s absentee ballots Hillary lost 51,384 votes in Milwaukee compared to 7,070 votes lost by Trump.
Hillary Clinton loses 51,384 votes in Milwaukee recount before absentee ballots compared to 7,070 for Trump.
To put Milwaukee’s vote in perspective there were a total of 413,154 votes where casts.
On average Hillary won by a 2 to 1 margin, which is similar to Hillary’s wins in other Democratic strong holds across the country for example for the entire state of New York, New Jersey, and California and is similar to most cities that Hillary won.
As expected Milwaukee’s vote count, excluding absentee ballots, fall in line with this margin, with Hillary winning 2 out of every 3 votes or 66.6% of the vote and Donald Trump winning 1 out of every 3 votes or 33.3%.
Yet the absentee ballots for Hillary came in at an 8 to 1 margin. This is a huge statistical deviation that screams of fraud especially given that the absentee ballots as absent ballots represented nearly 1/6th of the votes cast in Milwaukee.
There is no logical explanation nor are there any logical explanations to explain why Hillary would win several wards in Milwaukee at a 2 to 1 rate and have random wards with with win rates of 8 to 1 or 100 to 1 or higher right in the middle of those wards.
That is unless fraud is involved.
Milwaukee – Excluding Absentee Ballots
| – | Count | Pct % | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trump | 117,712 | 33.3% | 1:2 |
| Clinton | 235,865 | 66.6% | 2:1 |
| Total | 353,577 | – | – |
Milwaukee – Including Absentee Ballots
| – | Count | Pct % | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trump | 7,701 | 12.9% | 1:8 |
| Clinton | 52,080 | 87.1% | 8:1 |
| Total | 59,781 | – | – |
In Milwaukee, massive voter fraud was uncovered in favor of Hillary Clinton as state laws forced hand recounts which resulted in over 1/2 of her votes facing disqualification before the courts ordered the recount to halt.
As previously reported:
As Wisconsin recount results come in Milwaukee wards are showing anomalies that indicate potential absentee ballot fraud.
Update: A federal judge has halted the Michigan recount after the discovery of statewide voter fraud in Michigan.
The Wisconsin Board of Elections of elections is withholding Milwaukee absentee ballots from the official recount which as of day 5 shows Hillary Clinton losing 34,243 votes.
In doing so they may be telegraphing to the public there has been vote fraud conducted on behalf of Hillary Clinton as the missing votes, whether or not they are all absentee ballots, vastly favor Hillary Clinton by a margin of 10 to 1.
The anomalies come as massive vote fraud was uncovered in Democrat strong holds in Michigan just before a Federal Judge has halted the recount there.
According to the official original vote counts, Hillary Clinton won Milwaukee county by a little over a 2 to 1 margin winning 288,797 votes compared to Donald Trumps 125,846 votes which represents a 2 to 1 margin.
Digging into the recount results more glaring anomalies pop out, including one ward which Hillary won by a margin of 242 to 1 and six with margins higher than 100 to 1.
As the recount continues, some of these originally reported vote margins are being revised way downward more inline with the win margins of neighboring wards and with the county wide average.
For example, Hillary Clinton won Ward 34 by a margin of 100 to 1 in the original count but the recount now has it 2 to 1.
Oddly Hillary only won neighboring wards 33 and 35 by 2 to 1 margin which is inline with the county average.
Despite only a 2 to 1 win margin county wide some Milwaukee wards have anomalous win margins for Hillary Clinton in the original vote count. As the the votes are recounted, some of these margins are coming more in line with the county average.
Ward 32 originally showed a 5 to 1 victory for Hillary but but after the recount the margin is now closer to 3 to 1, again much closer to the county average.
In neighboring Ward 31 the original count shows Hillary winning by 10 to 1, but there are still no count results for the precinct.
Pennsylvania courts also dismissed Steins recount petition early today:
Pennsylvania denies Jill Stein’s recount on 6 separate grounds including hacking accusations “border on irrational”
Pennsylvania Denies Jill Stein’s recount on 6 separate grounds.
In the matter of Jill Stein vs the Secretary of State of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania:
Unsuccessful Green Party Candidate Jill Stein and Pennsylvania voter Randall Reitz allege that because Pennsylvania’s voting machines might have been “hacked” during last month’s election, I must order the Commonwealth to conduct a recount of the votes cast for President. There are at least six separate grounds requiring me to deny Plaintiffs’ Motion. Most importantly, there is no credible evidence that any “hack” occurred, and compelling evidence that Pennsylvania’s voting system was not in any way compromised. Moreover, Plaintiffs’ lack of standing, the likely absence of federal jurisdiction, and Plaintiffs’ unexplained, highly prejudicial delay in seeking a recount are all fatal to their claims for immediate relief. Further, Plaintiffs have not met any of the requirements for the issuance of a mandatory emergency injunction. Finally, granting the relief Plaintiffs seek would make it impossible for the Commonwealth to certify its Presidential Electors by December 13 (as required by federal law), thus inexcusably disenfranchising some six million Pennsylvania voters. For all these reasons, I am compelled to refuse Plaintiffs’ request for injunctive relief.
In denying the order the Judge Paul S. Diamond cited the following grounds for dismissal:
- Lack of standing – Jill Stein is not an aggrieved candidate and given a chance to testify as to why she was she did not.
- Lack of credible evidence that any “hack” occurred
- Lack of evidence to show that Pennsylvania’s election system is compromised in anyway.
- The accusations that Russia hacked the election “border on the irrational”
- Unexplained prejudicial delay with a later than last minute request.
- Granting relief would assure cause the state to miss the December 13 deadline and would disenfranchise voters by ensuring that no Pennsylvania votes are counted in electoral college.
Judge Diamond also explained that there is a likely lack of federal jurisdiction and Jill Stein has failed to meet any of the requirements for the issuance of a mandatory emergency injunction.
[…]
Read Full Article …
