Michigan Recount: Over 1/2 of Hillary Clinton’s Detroit Vote Faces Disqualification

Michigan votes in areas that voted for Hillary Clinton have been inflated due to worker error disqualifying recounts under state law.

Update: Michigan Recount Officially Halted After Mass Voter Fraud Discovery

Update 2: Fraud Audit Underway – 63% of Disqualified Detroit Precincts Had Too Many Hillary Clinton Votes

Ingham County Clerk Barb Byrum explains how entire voting precincts may be non-recountable in the presidential election recount that began Monday in Ingham and Oakland counties. Chad Livengood, The Detroit News

Michigan officials say they can not reconcile vote counts in 610 of 1,680 precincts, in Michigan’s largest county, Wayne County, which Hillary won by a margin of 2 to 1 over Donald Trump because the original vote counts in the poll books do not match the number of votes in the machine printout reports.

In Detroit officials report that 392 of 662 of precincts, or 59 percent, can not be reconciled.

Specifically, the number of votes recorded by the voting machines were higher than the number of voters that were logged into to vote in these precincts.

The news comes as Hillary Clinton lost 32,423 votes in day 5 of the Wisconsin recount which are now showing anomalies that may indicate absentee ballot fraud in Milwaukee.

In many cases Canvassers say there were aware of the discrepancies in the original vote counts but  gave no explanation for the why counts did not match up but certified the original election counts anyway.

Now officials are mainly blaming the discrepancy on jams in the optical ballots in the scanners which forced workers to run the same ballots through the machines more than once.

To prevent a ballot scanned multiple times from being counted as more than one vote poll workers were supposed to adjust the machine counters but officials stated the workers failed to do so in many cases.

They also state in more rare cases there could have been issues with people not having identification being manually placed in boxes or rare human errors such as sealing the wrong number of votes for certification due to transposing numbers.

Michigan state law requires precincts which poll books don’t match to be excluded from the recount and if the recount results can’t be certified, which requires reconciliation of the counts, the original certified results stand.

Issues due to human error, such as sealing the wrong number of votes in the original certification should be easily reconciled during a hand recount but in the precincts in question they are unable to reconcile the votes.

The discrepancy was only uncovered yesterday after an Obama appointed judge issued a midnight ruling ordering a hand recount in Michigan on Sunday.

Despite state law requiring the votes be disqualified election officials are fighting to keep the counts included and believe that not all of the 392 precincts will be excluded from the final recount.

There are also discrepancies in other counties Clinton carried but they are not as widespread as Detroit

Clinton carried Genesee County, which includes Flint, where so far 13 of 222 precincts are reported with invalid results but officials certified the results there as well.

Officials in Ingham reported six of their 30 precincts from Lansing including a ballot box with a hole in it which could have been used to slip in fraudulent ballots or remove legitimate ones.

Votes in Rochester Hills precinct 11 in Oakland county have been disqualified after more ballots were found in the machine logs than were actually in the ballot box.  Workers could offer no explanation other than it didn’t match in the original certified results and it doesn’t match now before conceding that the precinct is not recountable.


  1. Tonybinid
    Tonybinid 6 December, 2016, 16:59

    HA HA HA HA HA HA Jillary evil plan backfires!

    Reply this comment
    • Anonymous
      Anonymous 7 December, 2016, 17:39

      Jill Stein wasn’t doing this for Hillary Clinton. During the Presidential campaign, Jill Stein had gone on record numerous times saying, “What we fear from Donald Trump, we’ve already seen from Hillary Clinton.”

      Reply this comment
      • DRagon
        DRagon 8 December, 2016, 05:58

        Jill Stein is a PAID Clinton Employee, Get over it

        Reply this comment
      • Paul
        Paul 8 December, 2016, 06:51

        Stein only criticized Clinton during the campaign because she expected her to win easily and wanted to raise her own stature as the liberal voice of opposition during Clinton’s presidency. Now she is obviously being paid by wealthy Clinton supporters to support Hillary’s position.

        Reply this comment
      • Paul
        Paul 8 December, 2016, 18:31

        Stein was the one saying Trump was less likely than Hillary to start a nuclear war just weeks before the election.

        Reply this comment
  2. Tonybinid
    Tonybinid 6 December, 2016, 17:01

    HA HA HA HA HA Jillary evil plan backfires!

    Reply this comment
    • Nunya
      Nunya 9 December, 2016, 11:57

      How? You are confused I think. Green Party is not Democratic party. Hillary did not instigate this, and Jill stands to prove election count is not legit, which benefits her specifically, but she can get the support of the democratic party while undermining them at the same time. So if you are referencing Jill Stein..no, no it did not. Quite the opposite.

      Reply this comment
  3. Clinton News Network (CNN)
    Clinton News Network (CNN) 7 December, 2016, 05:24

    It’s very very obvious… OBVIOUSLY Trump and his best buddy Putin stole the election for Clinton so he could accuse her of vote fraud! We must lock him up and crown Empress Hitlery I

    Reply this comment
  4. Tired of Liberal Lies
    Tired of Liberal Lies 7 December, 2016, 08:44

    I absolutely love it! Turning out a direct repudiation of Hillary’s claimed popular vote lead at the rate this is going.

    Reply this comment
  5. bobwhite
    bobwhite 7 December, 2016, 23:37

    There is some bad math in this article. ” 610 of 1,680 precincts, or 59% of the precincts” is wrong. That is 36%. Makes me wonder what else is wrong in this article.

    Reply this comment
  6. Jjr
    Jjr 8 December, 2016, 11:59

    Not at all surprised! It’s the stupidity of those who continue to count knowing full well Hillary’s gang did everything they could to get her elected but again, GOD prevailed for American people! If we were able to get a true count thruout the nation, I guarantee she did NOT win the popular vote 😀 Never happen….

    Reply this comment
  7. Celia
    Celia 8 December, 2016, 19:32

    Thank you Jill Stein, you just exposed the fraud and guess what? It wasn’t in Trump’s camp. However you just wasted millions of dollars that could have been put to better use.

    Reply this comment
  8. DenverW
    DenverW 10 December, 2016, 13:22

    “in 610 of 1,680 precincts, or 59% of the precincts”

    Reply this comment
  9. chris52757
    chris52757 11 December, 2016, 14:44

    Having worked on the election board, the people who worked in these precincts should not be allowed to ever work in another election.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published.
Required fields are marked*