Obama Admin & UN Announce Global Police Force

Obama Admin & UN Announce Global Police Force
Obama Admin & UN Announce Global Police Force

Obama Admin & UN Announce Global Police Force

UN & Obama Admin Announce Global Police Force to Fight Extremism in US Cities

In countries all over the world, we are seeing military troops and equipment being merged with local police forces. Of course, this is being done as the only way to “ensure the safety of the people”. But it’s larger purpose is to mentally condition the average citizen to see and accept armed troops on every street corner as normal. In America, we watched them roll out martial law over the entire city of Boston for a complete 24 hour period as a lone gunman was tracked down.

On Tuesday, in referencing the Muslim refugee resettlement program of the Obama administration, I said that it was a step to Balkanize and terrorize the West. I warned that as soon as the chaos ensues from this invasion, the United Nations will be more than happy to step in on US soil to “keep the peace.” Lo, and behold, the Obama administration has just made it known they are preparing for just such an event.

On Wednesday, Property-grabbing Loretta Lynch told the United Nations that the Attorney General’s office, working with several US cities, will be working on a global law enforcement initiative. She referred to this initiative as the Strong Cities Network.

So, what is this for? It’s an attempt to enforce the sharia-compliant UN’s rules on America. It’s unauthorized by Congress and it’s unconstitutional.

Obama standing on Constitution 83013_n

According to the DOJ announcement, “Cities are vital partners in international efforts to build social cohesion and resilience to violent extremism.  Local communities and authorities are the most credible and persuasive voices to challenge violent extremism in all of its forms and manifestations in their local contexts.  While many cities and local authorities are developing innovative responses to address this challenge, no systematic efforts are in place to share experiences, pool resources and build a community of cities to inspire local action on a global scale.”

The reason there are no systematic efforts and that is because it is unconstitutional to do so. States have the right to deal with matters on their own without Washington or the UN interfering. It’s called the Tenth Amendment.

“The Strong Cities Network will serve as a vital tool to strengthen capacity-building and improve collaboration,” said Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch. “As we continue to counter a range of domestic and global terror threats, this innovative platform will enable cities to learn from one another, to develop best practices and to build social cohesion and community resilience here at home and around the world.”

Social cohesion? Whose social cohesion will be enforced (I mean, preserved)? Christian America? Communism? Islam?


The program launched without a word in the media on Wednesday. The claims is safety and security and “safeguarding the rights of local citizens and communities,” but we all know different, don’t we?

According to the DOJ release:

The SCN will connect cities, city-level practitioners and the communities they represent through a series of workshops, trainings and sustained city partnerships. Network participants will also contribute to and benefit from an online repository of municipal-level good practices and web-based training modules and will be eligible for grants supporting innovative, local initiatives and strategies that will contribute to building social cohesion and resilience to violent extremism.

The SCN will include an International Steering Committee of approximately 25 cities and other sub-national entities from different regions that will provide the SCN with its strategic direction. The SCN will also convene an International Advisory Board, which includes representatives from relevant city-focused networks, to help ensure SCN builds upon their work. It will be run by the Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD), a leading international “think-and-do” tank with a long-standing track record of working to prevent violent extremism.

Again, when did the Constitution provide for such things as SCN? Who will determine who “extremists” are? Will these extremists be some of the administration’s previous persons they have labeled as potential terrorists? The Obama administration has already scrubbed references to Islamic jihad from terror training materials and in its place has offered potential terrorists as the following:

1. Those that talk about “individual liberties”

2. Those that advocate for states’ rights

Get the full list here:


Video: Obama Admin & UN Announce Global Police Force

Categories: WORLD NEWS

About Author