OWS And The Tea Party Unite Against Big Brother’s Red Light Cameras

OWS And The Tea Party Unite Against Big Brother’s Red Light Cameras


The Establishment’s Worst Nightmare Is Coming True – Occupy Wall Street and The Tea Party Come Together Against Big Brother Red Light Cameras

Luke Rudkowski of We Are Change talks to William A Johnson about how he united Occupy Wall Street and The Tea Party in Dubuque, Iowa behind a populist cause – taking on Big Brother’s red light cameras.

They are integrated into a complete surveillance grid to feed system’s such as Trapwire.

For more see: Confirmed: New Nationwide ‘Trapwire’ Surveillance System Is Actively Recording, Monitoring Everything

Read just how shocked this Star Tribune reporter was to find out how much information the traffic cameras captured:

Police cameras quietly capture license plates, collect data

by: ERIC ROPER , Star Tribune

Police in Minnesota and across the country are increasingly using small car-mounted cameras to scan thousands of license plates and pinpoint — in real time — stolen vehicles, suspended drivers and criminals.

Those same cameras also record the time, date and location of every car they see and store the information. That disturbs privacy advocates, who want more details about the cameras and are calling for standards to govern how police classify and retain plate-reader data.

Without a state law, departments in Minnesota are free to set their own policies on how long they keep the information. The State Patrol deletes location data after 48 hours, St. Paul police erase it in 14 days and Minneapolis retains it for a year.

Minneapolis cops captured data on 805,000 license plates in June alone, and 4.9 million so far this year. When a Star Tribune reporter requested data on his own license plate under Minnesota’s open records law, the Minneapolis Police Department responded with a list of dates, times and coordinates of his car that illustrated his daily routine.

Over the course of a year, cameras in squad cars logged him heading to work on W. Franklin Avenue at 8:07 a.m. one day, returning home on Portland Avenue S. at 6:17 p.m. on another, and parking three times late at night outside a friend’s house in Uptown. Police had captured the car’s license plate seven times.

“The technology that would make ’1984′ possible in real life exists now,” said Chuck Samuelson, executive director of the Minnesota ACLU, which recently joined 35 of its affiliates nationwide to file data requests on how local agencies use the technology. “But the infrastructure to protect individuals’ privacies and rights doesn’t exist, particularly on the legislative and the judicial side.”

“The Minneapolis Police Department has no guidance from the state of Minnesota as to how long this data should be kept,” Sgt. William Palmer said in a statement Friday. “We are hopeful that such guidelines will be put in place for a statewide standard. Until such a time as guidelines are established the MPD has decided to keep this data for a period of one year to ensure we can comply with requests for public data.”

Public information

So who has access to your location data? Anyone who asks for it, according to Bob Sykora, chief information officer for the Minnesota Board of Public Defense. Sykora warned in a memo this June that location data retained by police is currently public. That means it could be obtained via record requests by data miners or other members of the public, he wrote, enabling burglars to learn someone’s daily routine or ex-spouses to track former partners.

“I really believe there’s a potential for somebody getting hurt or killed,” said Sykora, a member of the Criminal and Juvenile Justice Information Task Force, who will tell that body Friday that the Legislature should classify the data as private so only the subject of the data could obtain it.

Currently, only the plate number, time, date and location are available to the public, Sykora said. Other substantive information, such as the vehicle owner’s name and address, are already private. So a person would need to know the license plate number to track someone else’s car.

Rich Neumeister, a privacy and open government advocate, has been making extensive requests of local law enforcement agencies to determine how each uses license plate readers. “The bottom line in all this is that law-abiding citizens’ privacy and due process are compromised here with the new technology,” Neumeister said.

He would like the Legislature to address how long the data can be retained, how it can be shared and when police can use it. “Standardization is important for our liberty and privacies,” said Neumeister, who has found that agencies have implemented wildly different policies — in some cases no policy at all — largely out of public view.

The growing use of the technology has spurred a few other states to create laws governing their use. Maine passed a law in 2010, for example, that makes plate-reader data confidential and requires it to be erased in 21 days unless it is part of an investigation.

Widespread use

Use of license plate readers has expanded dramatically in recent years. Agencies using them in the metro area include Minneapolis, St. Paul, Bloomington, Lakeville, Maplewood, Washington County and the State Patrol. In March, the state Department of Commerce issued grants for even more departments to purchase readers, including four for the Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office.

“The [license plate reader] is valuable technology that saves time for the trooper while allowing them to be more productive and less distracted while observing license plates,” said Lt. Eric Roeske of the State Patrol in a statement.

St. Paul has used the cameras since 2008 and now has 10, all of which are mobile, said police spokesman Howie Padilla. He said they do not share the data with other departments.


Source:  Star Tribune

This model needs to be followed nationwide

If we really want true change people on both sides of the political spectrum need to past the issues that are used to keep us divided and instead focus on those things that everyone can agree.

We can implement those much needed changes if we stand united in a voice of solidarity.

Yes those things that people have lived in apathy for to long saying they will never change – from ending the bribery of our politicians to the ending of the outsourcing of jobs to ending perpertual wars for profits.

None of these things can happen if We the People do not have a voice in our government.

Right now our voice is drowned out by the corporations with endless pits of money and in order to regain that voice the left and the right need put the social differences that divide us to the side and focus on the key issues that we all stand united against.


Categories: POLICE STATE

About Author