Establishment’s New Narrative: It’s Civil War or a Trump Holocaust

The establishment is pushing liberals to launch a preemptive civil war warning a Holocaust is inevitable if Trump takes power.

liberals-contemplate-civil-war

Their warning is dire: America will soon face a Holocaust complete with mass killings committed by paramilitary death squads, ghetto interment camps and a raging world war which will all be justified by flag terrorist attack and false accusations of a military coup if Trump is not prevented from taking power.

Ivy league establishment historians are sounding the alarm that Trump must be prevented from taking power because once he does it will be too late.

At the same time the corporate media continues to flame conspiracy theories that Donald Trump and those in his inner circle are racist fascists supported by a massive base of white racist sexist males.

This is forcing the liberal masses into the false narrative that they must chose between civil war or a holocaust and as such they are now having an open discussion about which option they should chose while they continue to organize a resistance to fight back.

This dangerous narrative is being pushed by the liberal elite, including establishment politicians, the corporate media and all levels of academia in schools from elementary , middle and high school all the way to the college level.

This is a powder keg waiting to explode as a vast portion the public has been indoctrinated with their entire world view based on propaganda from corporate media news, what they are taught in school and what their celebrity demagogues tell them.

This entire mass of people are truly of the belief that their government is about to be taken over by a reincarnation of Hitler’s Nazis and they are all about to suffer the gloom and doom of World War 11 they are constantly slammed as whiny liberal snowflakes.

In their world view they are fearful about what they believe is an imminent fate and they are being slammed by fascist racist conservatives with no empathy for the intrinsic fears that have been implanted into them.

To that effect the Intercept and  AFP have published articles which cite historians comparing America to 1930s Germany before the rise of Hitler.

Both those article simply quote some historians but water down the the alarm they are raising.

And their warning is clear: an immediate resistance is needed now to prevent Trump from ever taking power because once he does it will be inevitable that America face holocaust.

Case in point is Timothy Snyder, the Housum Professor of History at Yale University and the author of Black Earth The Holocaust as History and Warning.

Snyder’s book Black Earth recounts the Holocaust of the 20th century and warns the world is ripe for a 21st century holocaust.

A brilliant, haunting, and profoundly original portrait of the defining tragedy of our time.

In this epic history of extermination and survival, Timothy Snyder presents a new explanation of the great atrocity of the twentieth century, and reveals the risks that we face in the twenty-first. Based on new sources from eastern Europe and forgotten testimonies from Jewish survivors, Black Earth recounts the mass murder of the Jews as an event that is still close to us, more comprehensible than we would like to think, and thus all the more terrifying.

The Holocaust began in a dark but accessible place, in Hitler’s mind, with the thought that the elimination of Jews would restore balance to the planet and allow Germans to win the resources they desperately needed. Such a worldview could be realized only if Germany destroyed other states, so Hitler’s aim was a colonial war in Europe itself. In the zones of statelessness, almost all Jews died. A few people, the righteous few, aided them, without support from institutions. Much of the new research in this book is devoted to understanding these extraordinary individuals. The almost insurmountable difficulties they faced only confirm the dangers of state destruction and ecological panic. These men and women should be emulated, but in similar circumstances few of us would do so.

By overlooking the lessons of the Holocaust, Snyder concludes, we have misunderstood modernity and endangered the future. The early twenty-first century is coming to resemble the early twentieth, as growing preoccupations with food and water accompany ideological challenges to global order. Our world is closer to Hitler’s than we like to admit, and saving it requires us to see the Holocaust as it was — and ourselves as we are. Groundbreaking, authoritative, and utterly absorbing, Black Earth reveals a Holocaust that is not only history but warning.

Snyder’s book has now dovetailed into an apocalyptic op-ed published he published on Slate which drives home the underlying theme with horrid detail that America is facing a holocaust if the people don’t rise up and prevent Donald Trump coming to power.

The article prophecizes that by the time Trump comes into power it will be too late. Trump will have already infiltrated the nation’s police, military and intelligence apparatuses with loyalist committed to his fascist cause.

Then once Trump has accomplished that he will then use a false flag terrorist attack, false accusations of an attempted coup and a political assassination to justify the use of military and paramilitary forces to commit widespread mass murders which will be acts that his civilians supporters will be all then more to willing to participate in.

According to Snyder, Trump will use his men trained in racism and conspiratorial thinking to penetrate the organs of state, especially the police.  By then it will be to late for those willing to resist Trump as he war in America using military, paramilitary and the police force will used establish ghetto internment camps to facilitate the mass murders.

Via Slate:

Him

His election that November came as a surprise…

is election that November came as a surprise. The conservative intellectuals had made telling arguments against his racism and conspiracy thinking. Rival nationalists had mocked his affection for a foreign tyrant. Businessmen had explained that economic isolation could only harm an export economy. All to no avail.

His followers had faith, of course. They had roared at his rallies and echoed his slogans. They had come out to vote, in higher numbers than expected, especially working-class men and women. Even so, the results of the election were paradoxical. The left received 1 million more votes than his party. But due to the vagaries of the electoral system he was called upon to form a government. His followers exulted, but the various right-wing elites preserved their calm. Although they had failed to keep him from power, they were sure that they could control him. He was good at convincing his followers that he was a revolutionary and convincing others that he was harmless.

His administration was at first a coalition of the old right and his new right. The members of the major left-wing party, historically larger than his, had a sense that something was afoot. But the left was divided upon itself and unsure about its leadership; its own conflicts could, from moment to moment, seem more pressing than the affairs of the country as a whole. He did not invent the highway, as his propaganda claimed, but he did support public works. This sort of thing helped to confuse the left and the workers.

Among much of the ordinary citizenry there was a certain faith that the political elite had matters under control. Among the elite there was a certain faith that state institutions would somehow protect themselves, that the rule of law and administrative habit would somehow maintain themselves. It was a minority that exulted in his power and a smaller minority that broke the windows and painted the symbols. Somehow, amid the misplaced hopes, his followers set the tone. As the mood changed, much of the citizenry began to think ahead about what he would want and make adjustments in advance. This made his task infinitely simpler.

Writers reflected upon how he was changing the language. He defined the world as a source of endless threat and other countries as cradles of countless enemies. Global conspiracies were supposedly directed at his country and its uniquely righteous people. His left-wing opponents and the national minorities, he insisted, were not individuals but expressions of implacable international enmity to the righteous demands of his own people. He said that he spoke for his people, that he was their voice. He had no concern for factuality; what he said about others was meant to generate a certain fiction. In some measure, he was working within the philosophical conventions of his time. Important thinkers of the era had declared that the idea of facts understood by individuals was humbug, opening the way for a sense of identity to be confused with the apprehension of truth. But he was also aware that mass media created the possibility to project big lies with such force that they drowned out the small truths. He had a certain undeniable charisma, and he was the first major politician of a new media age.

The terrorist attack came as a surprise. It was unclear whether he planned this himself, but it hardly mattered. He blamed the left, banned its parties, and had its leaders put in camps. A state of emergency was declared and never lifted. A one-party state emerged. The division of powers vanished. The parliament became a rubber stamp. The bureaucracy proved loyal to him. Bright and ambitious men with law degrees were found. For many lawyers and judges, professional ethics were somehow submerged in an understanding of the greater good of the nation, state, or race. Intelligent people found ways to place their own intellectual and moral evolution within this or that philosophical or legal tradition. The legal stigmatization of a chosen minority had the political consequence of binding everyone else closer to the state. The moment citizens did not oppose this measure, they were in effect supporting it. The moment they took advantage of it (by enrolling their children in schools that suddenly had empty places, for example), they were co-opted by it.

Many of those lawyers wore uniforms of a certain special kind. They were elite members of a certain institution, his bodyguard. He had called upon them to throw out dissenters at his rallies and to beat up opponents. An odd thing had happened when he had come to power. Suddenly people who had always presented themselves as being in opposition to the state were comfortable bearing arms for their personal leader. The process was of course an unruly one; some of these people had to be purged. He claimed, falsely, that a coup d’état had been staged against him and had one part of his bodyguard murder the leaders of another (and some of the old right-wing leaders in the bargain). Now his bodyguard started to seem like a means of social advance. Trained in racism and conspiratorial thinking, its men penetrated the organs of state, especially the police. If anyone had a chance to resist at this point, it was the commanders of the military and the directors of intelligence. A few of them were inclined to do so, but they overestimated themselves, failed to seek allies and counsel, and waited too long. Once the war started, it was too late.

The war came as a surprise. Although he had spoken endlessly about the need for struggle, it had not been so easy to find the pretext or the partner. In the beginning he had to concentrate on breaking treaties and pressuring neighbors. But then another strongman was happy to offer him an alliance. This brought what seemed like an easy beginning to conquest, and during combat political opposition became all but unthinkable. The bodyguard and the corporations negotiated exploitative public-private partnerships in conquered lands, known as “ghettos” or “camps.” The army was followed into the field by the paramilitary, which had its own tasks, such as mass murder. In the setting of war, not just the paramilitary but the police, the army, and even civilians carried out mass killings on a stupendous scale.

These crimes bound them all to him and to his mission and guaranteed that they would fight to the end. Having done great evil, they found it easy to imagine that the world was against them. His war would be lost. Only his crimes would be immortal. Before he killed himself he blamed his own country for his failures. And a nation that had once seemed destined to shape a century fell into the shade.

To be clear that Synder’s warning is an charged propaganda piece meant to serve as an actual warning against events to come, as opposed to a harmless piece of fiction, Snyder distributed the following the following warning on Facebook:

Americans are no wiser than the Europeans who saw democracy yield to fascism, Nazism, or communism. Our one advantage is that we might learn from their experience. Now is a good time to do so. Here are twenty lessons from the twentieth century, adapted to the circumstances of today.

  1. Do not obey in advance. Much of the power of authoritarianism is freely given. In times like these, individuals think ahead about what a more repressive government will want, and then start to do it without being asked. You’ve already done this, haven’t you? Stop. Anticipatory obedience teaches authorities what is possible and accelerates unfreedom.
  2. Defend an institution. Follow the courts or the media, or a court or a newspaper. Do not speak of “our institutions” unless you are making them yours by acting on their behalf. Institutions don’t protect themselves. They go down like dominoes unless each is defended from the beginning.
  3. Recall professional ethics. When the leaders of state set a negative example, professional commitments to just practice become much more important. It is hard to break a rule-of-law state without lawyers, and it is hard to have show trials without judges.
  4. When listening to politicians, distinguish certain words. Look out for the expansive use of “terrorism” and “extremism.” Be alive to the fatal notions of “exception” and “emergency.” Be angry about the treacherous use of patriotic vocabulary.
  5. Be calm when the unthinkable arrives. When the terrorist attack comes, remember that all authoritarians at all times either await or plan such events in order to consolidate power. Think of the Reichstag fire. The sudden disaster that requires the end of the balance of power, the end of opposition parties, and so on, is the oldest trick in the Hitlerian book. Don’t fall for it.
  6. e kind to our language. Avoid pronouncing the phrases everyone else does. Think up your own way of speaking, even if only to convey that thing you think everyone is saying. (Don’t use the internet before bed. Charge your gadgets away from your bedroom, and read.) What to read? Perhaps “The Power of the Powerless” by Václav Havel, 1984 by George Orwell, The Captive Mind by Czesław Milosz, The Rebel by Albert Camus, The Origins of Totalitarianism by Hannah Arendt, or Nothing is True and Everything is Possible by Peter Pomerantsev.
  7. Stand out. Someone has to. It is easy, in words and deeds, to follow along. It can feel strange to do or say something different. But without that unease, there is no freedom. And the moment you set an example, the spell of the status quo is broken, and others will follow.
  8. Believe in truth. To abandon facts is to abandon freedom. If nothing is true, then no one can criticize power, because there is no basis upon which to do so. If nothing is true, then all is spectacle. The biggest wallet pays for the most blinding lights.
  9. Investigate. Figure things out for yourself. Spend more time with long articles. Subsidize investigative journalism by subscribing to print media. Realize that some of what is on your screen is there to harm you. Bookmark PropOrNot or other sites that investigate foreign propaganda pushes.
  10. Practice corporeal politics. Power wants your body softening in your chair and your emotions dissipating on the screen. Get outside. Put your body in unfamiliar places with unfamiliar people. Make new friends and march with them.
  11. Make eye contact and small talk. This is not just polite. It is a way to stay in touch with your surroundings, break down unnecessary social barriers, and come to understand whom you should and should not trust. If we enter a culture of denunciation, you will want to know the psychological landscape of your daily life.
  12. Take responsibility for the face of the world. Notice the swastikas and the other signs of hate. Do not look away and do not get used to them. Remove them yourself and set an example for others to do so.
  13. Hinder the one-party state. The parties that took over states were once something else. They exploited a historical moment to make political life impossible for their rivals. Vote in local and state elections while you can.
  14. Give regularly to good causes, if you can. Pick a charity and set up autopay. Then you will know that you have made a free choice that is supporting civil society helping others doing something good.
  15. Establish a private life. Nastier rulers will use what they know about you to push you around. Scrub your computer of malware. Remember that email is skywriting. Consider using alternative forms of the internet, or simply using it less. Have personal exchanges in person. For the same reason, resolve any legal trouble. Authoritarianism works as a blackmail state, looking for the hook on which to hang you. Try not to have too many hooks.
  16. Learn from others in other countries. Keep up your friendships abroad, or make new friends abroad. The present difficulties here are an element of a general trend. And no country is going to find a solution by itself. Make sure you and your family have passports.
  17. Watch out for the paramilitaries. When the men with guns who have always claimed to be against the system start wearing uniforms and marching around with torches and pictures of a Leader, the end is nigh. When the pro-Leader paramilitary and the official police and military intermingle, the game is over.
  18. Be reflective if you must be armed. If you carry a weapon in public service, God bless you and keep you. But know that evils of the past involved policemen and soldiers finding themselves, one day, doing irregular things. Be ready to say no. (If you do not know what this means, contact the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum and ask about training in professional ethics.)
  19. Be as courageous as you can. If none of us is prepared to die for freedom, then all of us will die in unfreedom.
  20. Be a patriot. The incoming president is not. Set a good example of what America means for the generations to come. They will need it.

To give a candid assessment there has been widespread violence across the country against people and property.

The internet has been flooded with calls to resist trump ranging from a coup in the electoral college to calls to assassinate Trump to outright calls for civil war.

But the kicker here is the threats not coming just from on-line users but famous celebrities and CEOs are involved and the liberal media corporate media echo chamber is fanning the flames with a never-ending vicious cycle of their own fabricated fake news stories.

More evidence surfaces everyday that there is a deep indoctrination of the establishment.

Schools are handing out out anti-trump curriculum reinforcing the propaganda that there “many in America whoe are so racist,sexists, etc etc.”

Teachers have been recorded indoctrinating students with the Trump Hilter narrative.

One school teacher was recorded spewing out anti-Trump facism propaganda in class and even forced here students to write essays comparing Trump to Hitler and another was caught warning students only white Christians will be safe from trump.

Protests rage across the country, some turning into riots, all with the common theme that Trump is a Nazi fascist.

Twitter has been flooded with Tweets calling for the assassination of Donald Trump.

Even a Silicon Valley CEO has joined in.

ceo-threatens-to-kill-trump

CEO Says He Will Assassinate Trump: ‘Getting A Sniper Rifle’

Matt Harrigan, president and CEO of PacketSled, stepped down Monday after he threatened to assassinate President-elect Donald Trump.

Harrigan threatened Trump on his personal Facebook page, which has since been deactivated. Some of the comments were captured by Reddit users, which can be found here.

“I’m going to kill the president. Elect,” he wrote. After Facebook users posted concerned replies, Harrigan doubled down, saying: “Nope, getting a sniper rifle and perching myself where it counts. Find a bedroom in the whitehouse that suits you motherfucker. I’ll find you.”

His final post read: “In no uncertain terms, fuck you America. Seriously. Fuck Off.”

The corporate Media continues to incite violence with ad nasuem claims of racism and facism twoard anyone Donald Trump involves in his transition team or appoints to his cabinet.

The media is further stoking the mass violence with their new obsession with the conspiracy Donald Trump stole the election by committing voter fraud.

They are citing academics warning Hillary received far more paper votes than electronic votes.

Of course, they fail to realize the same anomalies were witnessed in the primary where Hillary stole the election from Bernie but they said nothing about it.

Moreover, they are also ignoring the fact that it was Hillary that was caught in paper ballot stuffing schemes during this election in Philadelphia and Florida among other states.

Back to ignoring the reality that the more logical explanation is Hillary simply received votes by paper ballots because her democratic operatives were able to stuff ballots in these locations while they weren’t able to manipulate the electronic machines..

Regardless, one of the things that will spark a violent revolution is stealing the election so the corporate media will continue hammering away on the conspiracy.

In response to all of this propaganda the left is organizing using the battle cry #Resistance.

This of course comes as the continental west coast is moving to secede from the Unite

To culminate all of this there are now open calls for civil war which followed calls for Trump supporters to be killed to prevent him from taking power.

Actor Calls for ‘Civil War’ and Voter Death

In off-the-wall rant, Michael Shannon claims Trump is ‘going to destroy civilization as we know it’

actor-calls-for-civil-war

“Man of Steel” and “Boardwalk Empire” actor Michael Shannon revealed in recent interviews he has no kind words for Donald Trump. That shouldn’t come as much of a surprise, since Hollywood has essentially declared war on the president-elect.

What should come as a surprise, and perhaps be concerning, is the vitriol in Shannon’s comments about both Trump and anyone who voted for the Republican nominee.

“If you’re voting for Trump, it’s time for the urn.”

In a chat with Rogerebert.com’s Nick Allen about the new film “Nocturnal Animals,” Shannon made his feelings about a Trump presidency very, very clear. The usually shy actor let loose and was more candid than before in any interview.

“I don’t know how people got so ***damn stupid. But it’s really weird, because it’s like the last eight years — now it feels like a lie. Like, this has been festering underneath the whole time. Racists, sexists. And a lot of these people, they don’t know why the f*** they’re alive. They know it. They’re doing drugs, f***ing killing themselves. Because they’re like, ‘Why the f*** am I alive? I can’t get a job, I don’t know anything about anything, I have no curiosity for life or the world.’ So this Trump thing is like getting a box of firecrackers, or something. It’s like, ‘Well, this will be fun for a little while, this’ll kill some time,’” Shannon said, using his apparently vivid imagination to express what he imagines Trump voters might be thinking.

The Academy Award nominee (for his work in the 2009 film “Revolutionary Road”) continued by saying a Trump presidency “is going to destroy civilization as we know it, and the earth.”

In a separate interview with Metro News, Shannon kept up the vitriol: “Maybe you need a civil war or something.”

The actor claimed that if millennials were in charge, Hillary Clinton would be the president-elect.

“There’s a lot of old people who need to realize they’ve had a nice life, and it’s time for them to move on. Because they’re the ones who go out and vote for these a**holes. If you look at the young people, between 18 and 25, if it was up to them, Hillary would have been president. No offense to the seniors out there. My mom’s a senior citizen. But if you’re voting for Trump, it’s time for the urn.”

Yet even that was not the most ridiculous or offensive thing Shannon said. He claims young voters would have put Clinton in the White House if not for those pesky senior citizens — when one of Clinton’s major problems was connecting with millennials.

[…]

What’s more shocking in Shannon’s comments is the level of discourse he reduces himself to when talking about voters and the man who will soon be president.

Leftists likes to think they are on the philosophically open side of political discourse — yet people like Shannon suggest every Trump voter is a jobless sexist and racist with no concern for the country or its direction.

[…]

Under Trump, this individual feels comfortable suggesting “civil war” and openly calling for a large bloc of voters to die. If Trump had lost and this was a public supporter speaking of Clinton and her voters — the story would be very different. An apology would be demanded, jobs would likely be lost, and moviegoers would be in disarray. With someone on the Left saying these things, it appears to simply be par for the course.

Yet even that was not the most ridiculous or offensive thing Shannon said. He claims young voters would have put Clinton in the White House if not for those pesky senior citizens — when one of Clinton’s major problems was connecting with millennials.

Liberals are now framing the narrative there are only two choices: Civil War or a Holocaust.

Here’s a collection of Tweets from Twitter discussing the narrative.

Here’s a moral dilemma: Say you believe this may be true. Do you challenge to stop an historic fraud or stay silent to avoid civil war?https://twitter.com/zeynep/status/801207035324866560

What’s the point of spending all this money on the military if the fuckers can’t organize a coup on January 20?

a $.40 5.56mm round would solve it as well.

Civil war may be unavoidable either way. Let’s at least get the election we have a right to.

Hard one, but I say challenge. That would be the principled thing. Civil War now or racism, misogyny, etc. for 4 years.

Civil war may be unavoidable either way. Let’s at least get the election we have a right to.

There’s no moral dilemma @dgardner YOU SPEAK OUT! @EmmMacfarlane https://twitter.com/zeynep/status/801207035324866560 … #resistance #fb

There’s no avoiding civil war, it’s just a matter of who starts it.

in the face of fascism do not stay silent. Fascism takes advantage of fear.

Avoid Civil War, or delay Civil War?

doesn’t matter, either way there will be a civil war.

Do you let a Russian/Alt Right hack steal the vote? Allowing a vote to be stolen means the Civil War was lost

Anything to keep that creature from the WH. Any “war” would be better.

Anything to keep that creature from the WH. Any “war” would be better.

There’s no other option. If the alt-reich want to start a civil war they’ll end up on the wrong side of history AGAIN

You challenge. Civil war could happen in either scenario, or not.

There’s not going to be an actual civil war if it turns out that Trump really lost. See

How deep have we already sunk if we even consider letting that go “to avoid civil war”?

good question….if you stay silent though and the info comes out anyway aren’t you just avoiding civil war?

Who is to say that staying silent to avoid a civil war does not eventually lead to one?

This is all surely leading up to something that will need to addressed, better sooner than later.

And if the successful fraud itself leads to neo-Nazi domination, rolling back civil rights, is that better than war?

Always stand up for what is right. Have the courage of your own convictions.

assuming one values their constitution, a “speak up”. tbh it depends on the likeliness of this actually avoiding anything. low.

Stop the fraud. The war is coming anyway.

we’ll have the civil war anyway. This way at least our side will fight… Ugh. Horrible to even say that, tho

A civil war is preferable to allowing #Fascism to endure. It leads to war in & of itself; illogical to acquiesce.

listen.
if y’all are trying to bring this nation to civil war, just tell me.
these loans can get defaulted on, TO-DAY.

militant photo

refering to shannon quote “My mom’s a senior citizen. But if you’re voting for trump, it’s time for the urn.” and if your parent’s voted for trump? “Fuck’em. You’re an oprhan now. Don’t go home. Don’t go to Thanksgiving or Christmas. Don’t talk to them at all
https://twitter.com/metroadlib/status/801211581199618049

Comments

  1. Pete
    Pete 23 November, 2016, 22:45

    Death squads and holocausts are Jewish inventions. and in this case where is the logic that Trump is planning a holocaust on anyone? He has repeated too many times that he will be forming a government for ALL THE PEOPLE. And will enforce just and Constitutional Laws. He is pro-second amendment.
    What more is needed to convince anyone that this is a Bankers Cartel lie?

    Reply this comment
  2. mazie
    mazie 24 November, 2016, 15:59

    The left is as evil as it comes. There is no hope for them. Their minds have been damaged by the propaganda from every kind of media technology and through schools public and private, taught by liberal-leftist-communists. Their brains are either mush or cement. Nothing – not knowledge or the bright light of freedom and liberty lives there – nothing but hate.

    Reply this comment
  3. Strayhorse
    Strayhorse 25 November, 2016, 17:51

    Bolsheviks are ramping up in America as they did in the Russian Revolution where 40-50 million pro-Russia, Christian, educated, hard working citizens of Russia were exterminated by the Bolsheviks using the various following methods of extermination:
    Genocide — under the Genocide Convention, the crime of genocide does not apply to the mass killing of political and social groups. Protection of political groups was eliminated from the UN resolution after a second vote, because many states, including Stalin’s USSR,[5] anticipated that clause to apply unneeded limitations to their right to suppress internal disturbances.[6]
    Politicide — the term “politicide” is used to describe the killing of political or economic groups that would otherwise be covered by the Genocide Convention.[7] Manus I. Midlarsky uses the term “politicide” to describe an arc of mass killings from the western parts of the Soviet Union to China and Cambodia.[8] In his book The killing trap: genocide in the twentieth century Midlarsky raises similarities between the killings of Stalin and Pol Pot.[9]
    Democide — R. J. Rummel coined the term “democide”, which includes genocide, politicide, and mass murder.[10] Helen Fein has termed the mass state killings in the Soviet Union and Cambodia as “genocide and democide.”[11] Frank Wayman and Atsushi Tago have shown the significance of terminology in that, depending on the use of democide (generalised state-sponsored killing) or politicide (eliminating groups who are politically opposed) as the criterion for inclusion in a data-set, statistical analyses seeking to establish a connection between mass killings can produce very different results, including the significance or otherwise of regime type.[page needed][12]
    Crime against humanity — Jacques Semelin and Michael Mann[13] believe that “crime against humanity” is more appropriate than “genocide” or “politicide” when speaking of violence by Communist regimes.[14]
    Classicide — Michael Mann has proposed the term “classicide” to mean the “intended mass killing of entire social classes”.[15]
    Terror — Stephen Wheatcroft notes that, in the case of the Soviet Union, terms such as “the terror”, “the purges”, and “repression” (the latter mostly in common Russian) colloquially refer to the same events and he believes the most neutral terms are “repression” and “mass killings”.[4]
    Mass killing — this term has been defined by Benjamin Valentino as “the intentional killing of a massive number of noncombatants”, where a “massive number” is defined as at least 50,000 intentional deaths over the course of five years or less.[16] He applies this definition to the cases of Stalin’s USSR, the PRC under Mao, and Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge, while admitting that mass killings on a smaller scale also appear to have been carried out by regimes in North Korea, Vietnam, Eastern Europe, and Africa.[17]

    Red Holocaust − still small pile of stones, commemorating the victims of communism, as such the first memorial in Germany (Jimmy Fell, 2011)

    Communist holocaust — the United States Congress has referred to the mass killings collectively as “an unprecedented imperial communist holocaust”[18][19] while the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation established by the United States Congress refers to this subject as the “Communist holocaust”.[20] The term “Red Holocaust” has been used by German historian Horst Möller; Steven Rosefielde has published a book on this subject titled Red Holocaust.[21][22]

    Are the current anti-Trump, anti-White, anti-Christian, anti-Republican protestors and violent advocates for the extermination of whites, the American version of the Bolsheviks?

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published.
Required fields are marked*